Recover Investment
Losses Nationwide
Losses Nationwide
Arbitration vs. Mediation in Securities Disputes
When resolving disputes with brokers or financial advisors, investors primarily rely on two alternative dispute resolution methods: arbitration and mediation. Understanding the key differences between these options is essential to effectively protect your investment rights.
What is Arbitration?
Arbitration is a formal dispute resolution process in which a neutral arbitrator or a panel of arbitrators hears evidence from both sides and renders a binding decision. It resembles a court trial but is usually less formal, faster, and more cost-effective.
Most brokerage agreements require arbitration through the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). Many registered investment advisory (RIA) agreements also include arbitration clauses, which may specify alternative forums such as the American Arbitration Association (AAA) or JAMS.
At Iorio Law PLLC, we help investors nationwide recover financial losses through securities arbitration.
What is Mediation?
Mediation is a process where a neutral mediator facilitates negotiation between parties to help reach a mutually acceptable resolution. Unlike arbitration, mediation does not result in a binding decision unless both parties voluntarily agree to a settlement.
How Do They Differ in Securities Law?
In securities disputes, arbitration is typically required by broker-dealer contracts and advisory client agreements, involving structured procedures such as arbitrator selection, discovery, and hearings. Decisions are based on evidence and applicable law.
Mediation, by contrast, is more flexible and informal, emphasizing party control and confidentiality. It typically resolves disputes more quickly—often within days or weeks—with over 80% success rates according to FINRA.
Mediation is frequently used as a settlement tool in securities disputes after an arbitration claim is filed but before a final hearing. This allows parties to obtain necessary discovery, evaluate their claims, and potentially avoid prolonged litigation.
Key Differences: Arbitration vs. Mediation
| Aspect | Arbitration | Mediation |
| Decision Maker | Neutral arbitrator(s), binding decision | Parties themselves, mediator facilitates negotiation |
| Formality | Formal hearings and discovery | Informal, flexible negotiations |
| Cost & Duration | Typically more expensive; 12 – 18 months | More cost-effective; often resolved in days or weeks |
| Settlement Rate | Binding decision, no settlement guarantee | Over 80% settle successfully |
| Confidentiality | Case private; final awards public | Entirely confidential |
When Should Investors Choose Arbitration or Mediation?
- Choose Mediation if your dispute can be resolved through negotiation, maintaining relationships, and you desire faster resolution at lower cost.
- Choose Arbitration if your case is complex, you need a decisive, binding resolution, or your evidence strongly supports your claims.
At Iorio Law PLLC, we help investors nationwide select the best dispute resolution method and provide strategic guidance throughout the process to protect your interests.
Speak with a Securities Arbitration Lawyer Today
If you have suffered investment losses due to misconduct by a financial advisor, broker-dealer, or RIA, don’t delay. Securities arbitration claims are time-sensitive and subject to strict deadlines under FINRA rules and state laws.
📞 Call Iorio Law PLLC at (646) 330-4624
📧 Email: info@iorio.law
📍 Based in New York. Representing Investors Nationwide.